2012 – Doom ain't What It Used to Be.
Preface about baldly bold statements.
This article is written for the cognoscenti...those in the know. There will be many statements that are made in this document that will require you to validate either the facts, or the conclusions derived from them on your own. Too many theories of too intricate or expansive (future joke here) a nature are involved for me to take time and space in this article to bring out all of their supporting details. So certain statements and observations will be made with no supporting material supplied as it is expected that motivated reader will explore the ideas in question on their own and reach conclusions that they find appropriate.
Still a Solar Cataclysm in 2012
In spite of the title, 2012 is still ALL about catastrophe, and cataclysm. To reach any other conclusion is to not be aware of manifesting circumstances. These include the many features of the planet that show scarring from past catastrophe as well as the amnesiac nature of our own species and the lack of any real history before 11,800 years ago. These facts include the earth, and all human history, all the “realstory” behind the 'history” that ThePowerElites want you to believe.
The facts pointing toward catastrophe, cataclysm, and extinctions here on earth over this next year and into 2012 are detailed now in hundreds of volumes; some of the best of these have been produced by Patrick Geryl and are available from his web site 'http://www.howtosurvive2012.com'.
Disagreements with some of Patrick Geryl's conclusions
Patrick Geryl is space focused and correct about the conclusions that he presents on solar system activity. His understanding of earth is not as detailed, in my opinion, and it has led to some incorrect conclusions. First, much of his understanding of how a pole flip occurs, as well as how a crustal slip may occur, is dependent upon the idea of the center of the earth having a rotating mass of molten iron, that is creating the planet earth's magnetic field by virtue of its spin. Now note that Patrick Geryl's information about the magnetic field itself is correct. The earth's magnetic field, humanities shield, is failing, and has a period that is about 11,800 years between re-charges. But, in my opinion, the idea of a molten iron mass spinning in the middle of the earth is false. First, molten metals cannot hold a magnetic charge, nor can they create one, no matter how fast they may spin. Second, even if molten iron could hold a magnetized state, it would take a mass of iron approximately half again as big as the whole of the earth to generate the level of magnetic field we can measure now, let alone at its peak. Further, in order for such an iron core to lose its magnetic field, assuming it could generate one at all, would be logically in the process of slowing down in its rotation. The whole 'iron core' theory relies on thinking of the core of the earth as a dynamo. So in following with that, the only way that earth could have a weakening magnetic field would be if the 'iron core' were to be slowing down. IF THAT were the case, we would know about it. Further, what we laughingly refer to as 'mainstream science' has recently determined that the core of the earth is not only spinning faster than the crust, but has recently begun to accelerate its spin rate. So much for the iron core idea.
Further, if the earth did have an iron core at its center, then this core would cool over the billions of years, and would solidify, thus altering our planet's active state into more of a dead state insofar as the tectonic plates are concerned. So that does not work logically either.
Further, Patrick Geryl's conclusions about how the earth will react to the upcoming solar catastrophe are based on academic mainstream thinking about planet earth, such as the 'iron core idea' , that are not consistent with today's knowledge. Patrick's conclusion that the sun will expel vast quantities of south charged, high energy particles is likely correct. BUT the idea that, as with small iron magnets, our core will flip, is not correct. He uses the analogy of the core, being a giant iron magnet, being pushed over as one can push over one magnet with another. This is likely not going to happen.
There are inherent physical problems with the idea of the planetary equatorial bulge 'relaxing' to allow for crustal shifts as described. Further the theory does not say how the relaxing of the bulge would impact the 'iron core' and the rest of the planetary structure. Nor does it account for the reconstructing of the planet over the 11,800 years between these events to its present, bulged out shape (equatorial bulge, look it up). Also note that the academic view that the equatorial bulge is due to centrifugal force is wrong. Yet another article there. However, that said, it is clear that periodic cataclysmic (for humans) catastrophes happen. Repeat that: catastrophe happens. Periodically. So how to account for it? Necessary thinking since we are due to live through it in the next few years. And the evidence is that these periodic catastrophes can nearly finish off humans as a species.
Other aspects of Patrick's justified concern for humanity during 2012 are based on evidence that the tops of mountains all over the planet once had sea water and ocean critters on top of them. Thus he concludes that waves of terrible height once over topped the various tall mountain ranges. There are other explanations for this fact that do not include waves washing over the Rockies, Andes, nor Himalaya's. There are also problems with the idea that sloshing oceans deposited the material. Some of these problems involve benethic organisms that had to have been living at that point when killed, so they were not merely dropped off at the top of the mountain by the wave as it passed. They are part of the mountain structure itself and speak to water covering the area.
However, let us not forget that Patrick is space and Sun focused, has decoded the Mayan mega sun spot theory, and is likely quite correct about what the Sun will do, as well as what the ancient Maya knew, though not necessarily correct in how the earth will react.
So my conclusion is that the 2012 cataclysm will not include the world traversing waves that Patrick thinks may result from a crustal shift. Indeed, and in spite of the work of Hapgood et al, it is my thinking that crustal shifts have never happened as described. As will be explained below, it is also my thinking that tectonic plates theory does not present an adequate understanding about the structure of our planet at all. All of the evidence for crustal shifts presented by Hapgood et al, are, in my opinion, accurately described, but can be accounted for by mechanisms other than a crustal shift. Yes magnetic pole shifts have and do and will occur (one in 2012), and yes they are devastating. Yes, instant freezing of large areas of the planet have occurred, but not (in my thinking) as a result of that area rotating under the pole.
Expando Planet Model
The Expando Planet model is a sub set of the Expando Universe model of reality to which we will return in a bit. We start with Einstein and the much discussed, debated, and hated, E=MC2 equation.
In Einstein, and Newtonian understanding of physics, energy transforms into matter and vice versa, so if you twist on uranium in just the right way with energy, it will transform a bunch of its own matter into energy very rapidly and thus we have nuclear plants and bombs based on this principle of 'exciting' the matter of uranium (and other radioactive elements) to convert to energy. Well...in this universe, equations work both ways, so theoretically we could take a bunch of energy and 'condense' it into matter (assuming we knew how). This matter could be as dense as version as we desired given that we are condensing it out of energy. So we would initially get simple molecules such as hydrogen and helium, but if we persisted, we could continue to coagulate the energy into denser molecules like oil, or iron, or gold. And thus is explained how the whole alchemy transmutation thing works. By condensation.
So, in the Expando Planet model, the continuous stream of energy from the Sun goes not only to the surface of the planets, but also to the center of the planets, where, given the correct conditions, and the existence of an active plasma core (Mars, as an aside, has none, and is therefore, a 'dead' planet), this energy is transmuted into matter. Note also that plasma is a great form of an 'energetic antenna' and actually (in laboratories) seems to draw energy to it via sympathetic resonance.
So some of the energies of the Sun hit the surface of the earth, but energy at levels we cannot detect without really really working at it, go to the center of the planet where they are condensed by that plasma environment into matter.
By the way, the plasma model would allow for a faster spinning core, AND a reducing magnetic field as the field strength is not dependent on size nor spin rate. And further the plasma core idea does fit with observable fluctuations in magnetic field strength over these nearly 12, 000 year cycles. And again, plasma core idea works with heat levels internal to the earth (lower you go, hotter it gets), as well as abiotic oil, and the creation of minerals as well as their location of deposits.
So, since magic likely is not how the core of the earth generates the magnetic field that we observe, it would seem more likely that the explanation is that the core of the earth is plasma. Plasma is highly excited energy, and does develop prodigious magnetic fields all out of proportion to its size. All of the observable magnetic effects on earth can be explained with the plasma core idea. Also, human experience with plasma fields and forms in laboratories provides observable evidence of the electro magnetic effects every bit as variant as seen on earth.
So, in the Expando Planet model of thinking about Earth, the plasma core gets energy steadily from the Sun and as a necessity, must convert this steady stream of energy into matter. Thus if the Expando Planet model is correct, one of the predictable effects would be that the planet would pretty much continuously grow. And that is also what observable, manifesting reality demonstrates. The Earth is slowly growing. Even mainstream science and mainstream media acknowledge this, though they never say why it should grow continuously if the core of the earth was actually iron. Oh well.... anyway, the plasma receives energy from the Sun at the core of the Earth, converts it to matter (e=mc2) and so then two logical questions then arise.....if energy is being transformed into matter in the middle of the earth, then where does it go? And....what happens to this whole matter creation mechanism if there is a sudden burst of energy from the Sun?
Mainstream science has always maintained that the planet grows slowly over time even without addressing why this should be the case. Further the whole point of the plate tectonic theory is 'propelled' by this idea of slow movement of the plates creeping about on liquid magma. Though against the idea of entropy, the cooling of the planet over time, and the rotation of the supposed iron core, the whole of the plate tectonic theory fails to hold up. Further, the presence of vast, previously unknown levels, of active volcanoes all across the planet does not support plate tectonics. Indeed, volcanoes are found even in places that the plate tectonic theory say should be subduction zones. So, to address the question of where does the continuously created matter go, we need only look around us. The matter quite actually 'bubbles' up out of, or as, the earth. And further, since it is created in the middle of an enclosed sphere (more or less, the earth is actually an oblate spheroid), the effects of matter created in the middle of a closed planet are naturally predictable. Imagine pumping water into an orange with a syringe.
East is east, and West is west, and never the twain shall meet. (apologies to Kipling, himself apologist for empire).
If the Expando Planet model is correct, there are some predictable effects that should be visible. One is that the 'skin' of our orange (planet earth) will rupture in specific ways that should form 'crinkly bits' for coast line on the anterior side of the tearing. These would be expected to be rough, ragged, vertically exposing of interior skin features, and not evenly spaced. In fact, we do see these in the form of the fiords observable on the western coasts of all continents. Further, if one obtains a reasonably accurate topological globe, it can be seen that no eastern coast of any continent resembles the western coast of that same continent. And all western coasts of all continents resemble each other, as do all eastern coasts of all continents. Further, even large islands such as Greenland, Iceland, Britain, et al show the same conditions.
That the western coasts are alike all across the planet, seems to be evidence of NO rotational change of direction. The idea being that a spinning planet always going the same direction, for millions of years, would naturally sculpt itself differently on the leading, or eastern coasts, over the trailing, or western coasts. And we do indeed see this at all levels, macroscopically, geologically, geomorphologically, topologically, and even biologically (different habitats supporting different species). And conversely, if that same planet had periodically changed rotation, there would be evidence for that on the coasts. Indeed, the giant, 2 kilometers high waves from the oceans sloshing out of their basins would be expected to have carved and eroded most distinguishing features from the coasts of all continents. If that had occurred even twice then effects would still be visible even 26,000 years later. No evidence of that is found. We would expect to see the western coasts very torn down, and not the sharp, ragged, torn appearance actually present. Further, it is on the eastern side of the continents that we find the sunken cities and other ancient signs of habitation. Further, the western sides of the continents are the more geologically active, which should not be the case if there were not expansion occurring continuously in the absence of crustal rotation. Indeed, the total absence of any expected degradation of the western, southern, or northern coasts of any continent (Antarctica excepted due to its location) is a very key point of evidence against rotation in any other direction than current. Repeating this for clarity. If the earth had ever had rotation problems that caused the oceans to leave their basins, we would see the evidence on some coast other than east. In fact, the eastern coasts of all the continents show continuous effects from the east to west rotation of our planet, and can be used as a model for searching for such evidence of rotation. None exists.
As an aside, if the plate tectonic theory was accurate, there would be more volcanoes along the eastern seaboard of the American continents, as well as along the western coast of Europe. Many more volcanoes. In fact, it should resemble the “ring of fire” in the Pacific. Speaking of volcanoes and magma, mainstream academic understanding of the earth and its formative history, would maintain that subduction zones should exist at all plate boundaries, and yet, there is no evidence of a subduction zone anywhere on earth. And, if the plate tectonic theory were correct, there should be NO mid Atlantic Ridge, nor the deep fissure valleys of the Pacific Basin. These are both predictable effects of planetary expansion. In the case of the Mid Atlantic Ridge, this ridge is specifically and exactly described as a necessary part of the Expando Planet theory, and is not at all explained by any variant of plate tectonics. In the Expando Planet model it is required that the 'skin' of the planet rupture at some point, at that this point is where the denser forms of matter (minerals, newly formed rocks, et al) will emerge. Unlike the gas and liquid matter being created in the earth, the solid condensates require at least one specific point of exit to the surface. Where the gasses and liquids can percolate up to the surface as we observe petroleum to do, minerals, specifically molten material that will crystallize as it cools, must force open a fissure to release the pressures behind it.
The deep ocean valleys of the Marianas and other Pacific Basin fissures are expected within the Expando Planet model as the 'skin' of the planet is forced apart in the Atlantic, where the new matter is coming up so thick as to form a ridge, it must necessarily 'thin' out over other areas since the whole of the sphere is expanding.
The Expando Planet model would also necessarily have the skin of the planet get crinkly as pressures of new matter forcing their way to the surface worked themselves out. So ridges would be expected to form. These would necessarily also be affected by the direction of rotation of the planet during the time that they formed and existed. So if the planet had ever rotated any other direction, there would be evidence, left over from gradual erosion, as well as 'spin direction resonance' found on the coasts, specifically the west coasts. The 'spin direction resonance' effect is what we see happening when, as an instance, a tornado deposits debris, it has a tendency to only be on specific sides of buildings or other objects. Similar effects show up in where the dust and things collect in parking lots. Basically the same principle. We see no such effects indicating anything other than east direction rotation.
Also if the Expando Planet theory is correct, then it is expected that the ruptured surface of the planet should resemble a picture puzzle in that the various sections should fit exactly back together when the 'new parts' are removed. Anyone who has ever looked at a globe gets the idea that ALL the continents were once connected along all the edges. The standard explanation for this offered by academics is the idea of one giant continent called Pangaea in one giant ocean on the earth at the same size as it is now. This explanation is clearly wrong as it defies math in the form of the spherical trigonometry expressed in the coasts of the continents. In other words. It is not possible, on a globe that is the size of today's earth, to fit the continents back together. The curvature of the earth gets in the way. The edges do not fit when this is tried. But clearly, the coasts of the continents, just as with the edges of a torn piece of paper, look like they fit together. Indeed they do. Simply not at the current size of the earth. For the edges of the continents to snug together (at the continental shelves), the earth would have had to be only about one third its present size.
Would that size of earth work for dinosaurs? Well....not surprisingly, yes. Obviously dinosaurs existed as we have their remains. Further, while the dinosaur fossil distribution itself supports the Expando Planet model, we need only examine the blood pressure issue to satisfy ourselves that this is a valid example. Basically the 'dinosaur conundrum' is as follows: how is it possible that dinosaurs could live on earth at such great size (height and girth), when we know that the tallest animals now (giraffes) are at the far limit of blood pressure versus gravity. At less than 17 feet in height, a giraffe is safe and happy, but let is grow only another foot, and it will die as the pressure on the heart becomes too much as it tries to pump blood up that height. However, dinosaurs were seriously taller than 17 feet. If the earth did not have much reduced gravity during the time of the dinosaurs, then their vascular system could never have handled the blood pressures required to raise blood the great distance to their brains. The same applies for the really big dinosaurs with tremendous girth. Other issues as to how their 'bird bones' could have supported such great weights are also related to the gravity of earth issue. Various theories have been proposed that include gravity as a variable in earth's past. This is my assumption, and the mechanism that is favorable is the Expando Planet model. Dinosaurs could not live on earth today. They far exceed the limits of what current levels of gravity will allow for pumping blood via biological means. So? If the gravity was less during their day, what could account for it? One postulate that makes sense, is that the gravity was less, and it was due to earth being significantly smaller. As cited in the previous example of the continents as jigsaw puzzle. As an aside, at some point, expansion of the earth will reach levels which make it impossible for humans to exist for the same reason. We will all be too tall to pump blood to our brains. So look to your local politician, and take that as a warning as to humanities future....life without blood in the brain.
There is also evidence in human works that the earth of today is not the earth of our ancestors. Since our species is periodically kicked to near extinction by catastrophe that the Expando Planet theory attempts to explain, it is understandable that there would not be many signs within our own work. This is due to most civilizations rising between the cycles of expansions. The problems encountered during the expansions wipe us out to really insignificant levels, and fundamentally reset the whole civilization to zero. But, there are some monuments, in fact thousands of them which may be evidence of the Expando Planet cycles.
One point is the 'mystery' of the megaliths (giant stone buildings) which are all over the planet. A great many of which are so large, and involve stones that are so large, that our current civilization could not duplicate the work. Further some of these megaliths are so large, that we humans have mistaken them for generations as part of the natural landscape. But, here is an interesting point. In a smaller version of earth, just as with the dinosaurs, gravity is less, and these stones would have weighed far less, thus presenting less of an issue in construction.
Other evidence of expanding earth is found in the design of some of the megaliths, which can be decoded to produce hints toward this idea. This subject is too voluminous to approach here. But, even absent any attempt by the makers of the megaliths to communicate ideas across time to future generations, there are physical effects on the megalithic monuments themselves which support the idea of an expanding planet model. Without getting into too much of debates about design ideas in ancient structures, we can at least note that such desert ruins as the Great Pyramids at Giza have boat docks at their base, and they and the Sphinx, show damage from centuries of ocean water exposure. While there are many theories as to how these structures could have spent centuries with their bases in water, one explanation is that as the earth expands, water levels are significantly affected. Not as Patrick Geryl suggests, nor as in the bible myths of a planet covering flood, but rather as a result of shifting (rising) matter entering the oceans and displacing water. Further, the actual mechanism from the expansion would be thought to produce neither tidal style flooding, nor tsunami flooding, but rather something entirely different. Perhaps best described as 'persistent flooding', there are many descriptions of such in many ancient texts including those in Sanskrit. Graham Hancock's work, Underworld, in which he visits many of the sunken cities around the planet actually highlights the mechanism of 'persistent flooding' without using that label. He refers to ancient accounts of 'flood waters' that 'just kept coming'. Unlike the tide, these did not retreat. And unlike tsunami, these floods were not particularly violent. Just water levels rising, and continuing to rise without stopping. Fast enough to swallow your coastal city over a week, but not so fast that humans and animals cannot stay ahead of it. And these waters were noted to still be supporting tidal actions. So it was as though two separate forces were at work on the ocean, each affecting its volume in different ways.
Further, we have direct, experiential evidence of Expando Planet model on a small scale being demonstrated on the moons that our various spacecraft have seen in their journeys. Frequently (especially these last few years of increased Sun activity) these will present expansion in the form of giant geysers of material shooting out into space. Hmmmm...where did that stuff being thrown into space come from if not from the pressures of new matter being created in plasma balls at the center of these fellow solar system occupants? How is it that a small moon is able to spew geysers of material into space repeatedly? Would it not exhaust itself over the course of millions or billions of years?
The Expando Planet model can explain many of the various enigmas present in our solar system. As the Expando Planet theory is fractally based, then it must appear as a design pattern in other parts of universe to be a valid concept (in my opinion). This is just what is observable from the very large with the Expando Universe model (for another article), and down to the very small with how insect shells (skin) grows, how human skin alters itself to cover burns, and other scarring features on all animals. The basic design pattern is also present in plants from their root growth methods to how their skin coverings accommodate internal growth.
And note that the whole “Altantis going beneath the waves” concept needs to be reconsidered in light of this theory. Plate tectonics cannot explain how whole continents would just sink, and rapidly. The Expando Planet model allows for the edges of the continents to subside, as we see around India, and Japan, and throughout Asia, as well as in the Caribbean, and Mediterranean seas. It also allows that such events could happen quickly, as in essence, the low lying coastal plains will 'slide down as the continental shelves supporting them slide down into the crevasse' created by the expansion of the planet. But, the Expando Planet model does not allow for whole continents to just 'sink'. However, in the Expando Planet model, Atlantis and other civilizations can easily be on coastal plains that sink as the cracks widen and the skin of the earth 'thins out' in areas. Further, the new matter rising both as solid minerals in the Mid Atlantic, and as magma from all over the planet, both will cause the ocean level fluctuations as land forms change near the cracks in the earth's skin. Further, it can be expected that a large proportion of the new matter being created will be water. This will also affect the ocean levels.
The Expando Planet model is also supported by the evidence of large areas of the planet going into an 'instant freeze' such that animals are flash frozen while munching on grass or pies. The Expando Planet model has at its core (pun intended) the plasma core which can become very chaotic, and is expected to produce huge 'toroidal imbalances' which will result in a bunch of 'magnetic field anomalies' that will resemble 'magnetic tornadoes'. These will reach out into deep space and will funnel down not only huge levels of highly charged particles, but also, vast quantities of very very very cold cold from space. The air will freeze as it is. So will anything under one of these toroidal vortexes. And since many of them will be associated with where the new magnetic pole will reside (after a bit of a walk-about), it is understandable that many of these flash frozen areas will stay frozen.
Predictable signs of pending expansion of the planet.
Less sea ice...planet expanding, larger sea area, ice spreads out.
Weather changes are to be expected due to changes in the planet size, the surface area of the oceans, and the heights of mountains (more on this in another article). Other impacts will show up in ocean currents as new (and mostly hot) matter is pumped into the planet skin (crustal complex). There are also expected electric and magnetic effects as the expansions are concurrent with solar system wide changes affecting energies at all levels. The sum total is screwy weather for the entire time of the expansion event.
One very predictable, and noticeable effect of the Expando Planet model, if accurate, would be that cracks in the planet would open up in a variety of areas. Is there evidence for such...yes, and it is rapidly increasing. Planet Earth has recently (last ten years) created a huge new crack, called a 'future sea' by mainstream science, that will at some point, separate Africa from the Arabian peninsula. This crack appeared suddenly. Further, there are new cracks these last two years across all continents excepting Antarctica (may be some there, but news does not come out easily from those environs). Also, some of these cracks are gigantic and appear almost instantly. The speed of their appearance is just the kind of thing that plate tectonic theory does NOT support, and just the sort of activity we would expect from the Expando Planet model.
Another certain sign will be the rapid increase in large, damaging sinkholes. Again, skin stretchs and things 'give way' below our feet, or foundations.
Though the problem referenced below is USA centric, it does not mean that such effects will be limited to North American continent. New Madrid is a particular fear point for many people at the moment, and the federal government of the US seems to be sharing that fear if the reports of tens of millions of emergency meals, multiple person plastic coffins, relocation camps, and federal emergency preparedness exercises are any indicator. It would seem that their fear would be well placed given the Expando Planet model of things. If one examines a topologically accurate globe that includes sea bed contours, it can be observed that a 'natural' fault line seemingly runs from Lake Michigan through the Mississippi River valley to the Gulf of Mexico. It would be expected that such areas at this will crack further as the next expansion event occurs. Thus the idea that the Great Lakes may one day drain into the Gulf of Mexico is plausible.
An interesting observation is that topologically accurate globes may be able to be used to search for likely ruptures and stretching points across the planet. And if the Expando Planet model is accurate, then both underseas heat patterns and earthquake activity need to be examined in a new light. Take, as an example, all the earthquakes and separate them not by geographic location, but rather by depth, then magnitude. This new picture, when pasted back onto a sphere will indicate the points of the next 'ripping events'.
When we consider the Expando Planet model in abstract, holding the planet earth in our mental hands and rotating it about, we notice that if the planet is expanding from internal pressures, then certain predictable behaviors should present themselves. First, the locations of sinkholes and tears should be between the tropics (in the main) due to the equatorial bulge. In fact, note that in the Expando Planet model, the equatorial bulge is a sign of planetary health, and internal matter creation pressures. So earth bulges around the middle not due to centrifugal forces, but due to internal pressures. Thus the idea that the equatorial bulge can 'relax' either slowly or rapidly is not supported. Further, the Expando Planet model with an equatorial bulge due to internal pressures would account for movement of continents relative to each other as well as gradual creep of the continents over the continuously stretching spherical surface. Note that this last is very important. Referring back to earthquake for a moment, and specifically the very shallow, and very damaging earthquake recently seen at ChristChurch, New Zealand. Such quakes are predictable on land masses on both poles. Further, the Expando Planet model suggests that likely sites for shallow, high amplitude wave, damaging quakes will be at just those places where humans like to live....ie in the inland points of the 'crinkly bits' or natural harbors along coasts. As with the late 1950s shallow, damaging earthquakes in Alaska, the nature of the quake is forecasting the emergence of a rupture in the region. ChristChurch is likely situated at the 'head' of a natural 'tear' in the coast line. These kinds of quakes are expected because of where New Zealand is on the globe relative to the pressures created on the crust by the equatorial bulge. These pressures will tend to produce different types of quakes at different points on the sphere. Further, the theory can be used to predict both relative frequency and depth of large quakes during the expansion event. Unfortunately for New Zealand, the theory clearly points toward more 'tearing forces' to be manifesting from 45s by 180 degrees as indicated by both topology and hyper-dimensional (hyper-spatial) maths. These 'tearing forces' in the ocean on the other side of the Chatham Rise will be presenting to New Zealand further earthquakes over the rest of 2011 and certainly through 2012.
In looking at potential and predictable problems arising in 2012 as a result of the energy burst from the sun causing lots of material creation and thus expansion pressures from within the earth, as humans, we need to also focus our attention on human creations. These will not only include buildings, but also dams, and reservoirs, and the real nasties. Before moving on to the latter, let us note that mega earth projects such as the Hoover, Grand Coulee, and Three Gorges dams, among others, are at risk for catastrophic and cataclysmic failure as the planet actually pulls apart around them, or, alternatively, as the surface crinkles up underneath them.
Train derailments, and other impacts on human infrastructure. Including worries about dams. Sinkholes, in fact many of the problems claimed as issues of the approach of the planet X would be expected in the Expando Planet model.
Magnetic Field is recharged. This sounds good in theory, but living through the process may not be easy, or even likely. Noting that this is one of the many areas in which Patrick Geryl is correct, we proceed to the idea that we are basically friggen doomed. The sun will spew out huge volumes of energy and material in 2012. Much of it directed right towards earth. As we know, it is our magnetosphere that protects us from much of this radiation. Well, the magnetosphere is failing, and seriously needs a recharge, but to do so we have to live through the energy exchange from the sun to the earth necessary to the task. So Patrick Geryl is correct, and we can expect a very large burst of south/negative charged particles to hit our South Pole. This will be absorbed by the planet, and a good deal of the energy will be sucked into the plasma core, thus providing for both the recharge of the magnetic strength of our magnetosphere, and the flip of the magnetic poles, north for south. This will be a very messy, and dangerous process for life here on earth. As the magnetic poles flip, the charge of the magnetosphere will go to zero and dangerous radiation will pour down upon the planet and us guys, its inhabitants. Not good. Terminal sunburns in minutes. Burning of anything directly in the path of the sun's output. Cook your dinner in a pot outside in minutes. That sort of thing. But not good for life. Noting that Patrick is likely also correct, and the radiation danger period is probably brief, on the order of few days. He is also correct in that the magnetic poles will flip as the plasma core absorbs the south/negative charged particles and becomes dominated by them, a side effect of which recharges our magnetosphere later in the process. The plasma core will actually flip physically, but as it has virtually no mass relative to the planetary crust, and will 'flip' by going 'inside out' relative to polarity means that only the magnetics will change here on the crust of earth, but this also allows for both chaotic polarity points, and very rapid magnetic changes. Unlike the 'molten mass of iron core' theory which presents lots of issues about altering its rotation, physical constraints and magnetic charge. It can be imagined as to the dangers presented to life by this part of the 2012 events.
Further problems for humans will include the direct effect on our consciousness of the solar radiations once the magnetosphere has collapsed. Other issues include physical burns, radiation burns, destruction of crops, loss of life as animals en masse on land, in the air, and under water, are killed by both magnetic waves and radiation from space. Further issues will present themselves in the form of mental problems for those who do survive by hiding from the radiation exposure.
The total infrastructure of humans that is in any way bound to electricity is likely to fail, and probably spectacularly so. Predictable electrical and magnetic problems are already observable as has been noted on many 'conspiracy fact' sites. The predictable biological effects arealready happening as the 2012 expansion event ramps up under our feet. The mass die off of birds, and ocean life already seen is very likely the early edges of what will occur in 2012.
We also face the problems inherent in nuclear reactors deprived of an electrical grid, as well as the expected severe increase in earthquakes globally. Bearing in mind evidence exists that can be interpreted as the earth having had 30 degree crustal shifts. The Expando Planet model also can explain this evidence, but still must deal with the issues of sudden, and violent expansion rates of the earth. As part of this expansion process, the number of shallow, and significant earthquakes is expected to rise dramatically. This will not be good for nuclear reactors, biochemical weapons storage areas, and fuel ports, pipelines, storage facilities, port facilities, airplane travel (radiations)....which pretty much gives you the way to consider what we face. Ancient sanskrit descriptions of oral tradition have previous periods being filled with what we would consider to be 7.+ earthquakes. Some records speak of times when they were happening multiple times a day after having ramped up over the course of a single lifetime. The earthquakes grew to the point that whole villages relocated to escape the daily damage.
The Good News
The good news about the Expando Planet model is that as each expansion occurs, the earth grows. Both in mass and size, and thus each subsequent release of energy in the next cycle by the Sun, will be impacting a larger planet and will be proportionally smaller. Thus the expansion event that occurred 11,500 years ago had more impact on earth as earth was smaller then. Just as the expansion events during the days of the dinosaurs were hugely impacting of the planet due to earth being about a third of its present size. So the good news is that as the expansions continue, the effects diminish over time. Not that this will help us much during our up coming cataclysmic catastrophe.
The good news includes the thought that no continent crossing waves of 2+ kilometers height are likely to occur. However, as the expansion occurs, there will be huge waves probably as high as 800 meters or so, or near the theoretic maximum limit in wave height rising into land. So....still waves on the order of 2600 feet or more, but none that will cross the great mountain ranges. Also the good news would include only limited continental penetration by waves. And these should be predictably larger and more devastating, and flood further inland on the eastern coasts of the continents than on the west. On the other hand, the western coasts will have to deal with significant winds, and torrential amounts of water both from rains, and from tsunamis. As the ocean floors tear and thin, waves from ruptures and landform shifts will assault the coasts. For reasons too detailed to pursue here, they will be more of a problem for west coasts than east. Also volcanic eruptions, and large scale heating of the waters will result in increasing evaporation causing the 'atmospheric rivers' to grow in orders of magnitude.
Additionally, wind patterns of west to east flows will accelerate as the mass and moment of the atmosphere increases due to new volumes from the oceans. So the good news is that the new moment will produce faster winds which shouldaid in scrubbing out the horrific amounts of dust and ash from all the volcanoes and earthquakes.
This understanding is the result of a lot of gnawing on universe. It is merely encapsulated in this effort as there are ramifications and twisty side effects going out in all directions from this gnawing.
We are still facing civilization doom in 2011 and 2012. The doom starts the day that the Sun takes out the planetary electrical grid. Patrick Geryl is remarkably correct in all his space and sun focused reasoning,and his worry that October 11, 2011 will be that day is well taken. It canhappen at any time now. Given the rapid increase in solar intensity values that Patrick shares at hiswebsite, it would seem most likely to occur between October 11,2011, and May of 2012. That NASA isalso concerned about solarproblems through this period acts as yet more fuel for the necessary paranoia. Further paranoia flares up thinking about the trillions of dollars putinto underground shelters by government for the elite. That does not bode well.
We still face species doom in 2011 and2012, but given this new understanding and the context of the Expando Planet model, that doom ain't what it used to be.
Now we must go off andgnaw on universe more intently. If Patrick is correct, we have until October 11, 2011 to make our peace with people (most, perhaps 90%,will still perish), and complete our preparations.
Good luck to all humans, and remember, if the Expansion shit hits the fan, the elites will find themselves as 'spam in a can'. This gives new meaning to the old french peasant retort, of
'one day, we will all eat the rich'
There are many more predictable problems and challenges that flow from this idea. They may be reported here if we all have time. My personal schedule will be to get preparations complete by July 15th. One cycle early is way better than one cycle late.
Be sure and visit Patrick Geryl's site for updates on the Maya Solar intensity strength numbers. This level of awareness will be a key survival factor going forward.
Given opportunity and motivation, i may provide graphics later.
February 28, 2011
If cited, attribution or link to original is required under fair use copyright.